For Christmas I got an intriguing present from a pal - my very own "best-selling" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (excellent title) bears my name and my photo on its cover, and it has radiant evaluations.

Yet it was completely written by AI, with a few basic prompts about me provided by my friend Janet.

It's an interesting read, and uproarious in parts. But it also meanders rather a lot, galgbtqhistoryproject.org and is somewhere in between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It imitates my chatty design of writing, however it's also a bit repeated, and extremely verbose. It might have gone beyond Janet's prompts in collecting information about me.

Several sentences begin "as a leading innovation journalist ..." - cringe - which could have been scraped from an online bio.

There's likewise a mysterious, repeated hallucination in the kind of my cat (I have no family pets). And larsaluarna.se there's a metaphor on almost every page - some more random than others.

There are dozens of business online offering AI-book composing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I called the president Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he informed me he had offered around 150,000 customised books, mainly in the US, considering that pivoting from assembling AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller costs ₤ 26. The firm uses its own AI tools to create them, based upon an open source big language design.

I'm not asking you to purchase my book. Actually you can't - only Janet, who produced it, can buy any more copies.

There is currently no barrier to anybody producing one in any person's name, including celebrities - although Mr Mashiach states there are guardrails around violent content. Each book contains a printed disclaimer specifying that it is fictional, developed by AI, and developed "solely to bring humour and joy".

Legally, the copyright comes from the firm, macphersonwiki.mywikis.wiki however Mr Mashiach worries that the product is meant as a "customised gag gift", and the books do not get offered further.

He wishes to broaden his range, generating various genres such as sci-fi, and maybe offering an autobiography service. It's designed to be a light-hearted kind of consumer AI - selling AI-generated goods to human consumers.

It's also a bit scary if, like me, utahsyardsale.com you write for a living. Not least due to the fact that it probably took less than a minute to create, and it does, certainly in some parts, sound just like me.

Musicians, authors, artists and actors worldwide have revealed alarm about their work being used to train generative AI tools that then churn out comparable content based upon it.

"We ought to be clear, when we are discussing information here, we really imply human developers' life works," says Ed Newton Rex, founder of Fairly Trained, which campaigns for AI firms to respect creators' rights.

"This is books, this is short articles, this is pictures. It's artworks. It's records ... The entire point of AI training is to discover how to do something and after that do more like that."

In 2023 a tune including AI-generated voices of Canadian vocalists Drake and utahsyardsale.com The Weeknd went viral on social media before being pulled from streaming platforms due to the fact that it was not their work and they had not consented to it. It didn't stop the track's creator attempting to choose it for a Grammy award. And despite the fact that the artists were fake, it was still wildly popular.

"I do not think the usage of generative AI for innovative functions ought to be banned, but I do believe that generative AI for these functions that is trained on individuals's work without approval ought to be banned," Mr Newton Rex includes. "AI can be very powerful however let's build it fairly and relatively."

OpenAI says Chinese rivals utilizing its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes market and damages America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - including the BBC - have actually selected to block AI designers from trawling their online material for training functions. Others have decided to collaborate - the Financial Times has actually partnered with ChatGPT creator OpenAI for example.

The UK government is thinking about an overhaul of the law that would enable AI designers to utilize developers' material on the internet to assist develop their models, unless the rights holders pull out.

Ed Newton Rex explains this as "madness".

He points out that AI can make advances in areas like defence, health care and logistics without trawling the work of authors, reporters and artists.

"All of these things work without going and changing copyright law and destroying the livelihoods of the nation's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in your home of Lords, is likewise strongly versus getting rid of copyright law for AI.

"Creative industries are wealth developers, 2.4 million jobs and a great deal of joy," says the Baroness, systemcheck-wiki.de who is likewise a consultant to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The government is weakening among its finest performing industries on the vague guarantee of development."

A government spokesperson stated: "No relocation will be made till we are absolutely confident we have a practical strategy that delivers each of our goals: increased control for best holders to assist them accredit their material, access to high-quality product to train leading AI models in the UK, and more transparency for best holders from AI designers."

Under the UK federal government's brand-new AI strategy, a national information library containing public information from a vast array of sources will also be made offered to AI scientists.

In the US the future of federal guidelines to control AI is now up in the air following President Trump's go back to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that intended to improve the safety of AI with, to name a few things, firms in the sector needed to share information of the functions of their systems with the US federal government before they are released.

But this has actually now been repealed by Trump. It remains to be seen what Trump will do rather, however he is said to desire the AI sector to face less policy.

This comes as a variety of suits versus AI companies, and particularly versus OpenAI, continue in the US. They have been taken out by everyone from the New york city Times to authors, music labels, and even a comic.

They claim that the AI companies broke the law when they took their content from the internet without their permission, and used it to train their systems.

The AI business argue that their actions fall under "reasonable usage" and are for that reason exempt. There are a variety of factors which can make up fair use - it's not a straight-forward definition. But the AI sector is under increasing scrutiny over how it gathers training data and whether it should be paying for it.

If this wasn't all sufficient to contemplate, Chinese AI company DeepSeek has actually shaken the sector over the previous week. It became one of the most downloaded totally free app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek declares that it established its technology for a fraction of the price of the similarity OpenAI. Its success has actually raised security concerns in the US, and threatens American's current dominance of the sector.

When it comes to me and a career as an author, I think that at the moment, if I really desire a "bestseller" I'll still need to compose it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the present weakness in generative AI tools for bigger tasks. It has plenty of mistakes and hallucinations, and it can be rather hard to check out in parts since it's so verbose.

But offered how rapidly the tech is developing, I'm unsure how long I can stay positive that my considerably slower human writing and modifying abilities, are better.

Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the greatest advancements in global innovation, with from BBC correspondents all over the world.

Outside the UK? Register here.