For Christmas I received an interesting present from a buddy - my really own "very popular" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (terrific title) bears my name and my image on its cover, and it has radiant evaluations.

Yet it was entirely composed by AI, with a few simple prompts about me supplied by my pal Janet.

It's a fascinating read, and extremely amusing in parts. But it likewise meanders quite a lot, and is somewhere between a self-help book and higgledy-piggledy.xyz a stream of anecdotes.

It simulates my chatty design of composing, but it's also a bit repetitive, and extremely verbose. It may have surpassed Janet's triggers in looking at data about me.

Several sentences begin "as a leading technology reporter ..." - cringe - which might have been scraped from an online bio.

There's likewise a mystical, repetitive hallucination in the type of my cat (I have no pets). And there's a metaphor classihub.in on practically every page - some more random than others.

There are dozens of companies online offering AI-book composing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I contacted the primary executive Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he informed me he had sold around 150,000 personalised books, primarily in the US, because rotating from compiling AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller costs ₤ 26. The company uses its own AI tools to them, based upon an open source big language model.

I'm not asking you to buy my book. Actually you can't - just Janet, who developed it, can purchase any additional copies.

There is currently no barrier to anybody developing one in anybody's name, consisting of celebrities - although Mr Mashiach says there are guardrails around violent content. Each book includes a printed disclaimer specifying that it is imaginary, produced by AI, and created "entirely to bring humour and happiness".

Legally, the copyright belongs to the company, macphersonwiki.mywikis.wiki but Mr Mashiach worries that the product is planned as a "personalised gag present", and the books do not get offered even more.

He intends to widen his variety, creating different genres such as sci-fi, and perhaps offering an autobiography service. It's developed to be a light-hearted kind of customer AI - selling AI-generated goods to human customers.

It's also a bit scary if, like me, you compose for a living. Not least since it probably took less than a minute to create, and it does, certainly in some parts, sound much like me.

Musicians, authors, artists and actors worldwide have expressed alarm about their work being utilized to train generative AI tools that then produce similar content based upon it.

"We should be clear, when we are talking about data here, we really suggest human developers' life works," says Ed Newton Rex, founder of Fairly Trained, which campaigns for AI firms to regard developers' rights.

"This is books, this is articles, this is photos. It's masterpieces. It's records ... The entire point of AI training is to find out how to do something and after that do more like that."

In 2023 a tune featuring AI-generated voices of Canadian vocalists Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social media before being pulled from streaming platforms since it was not their work and they had actually not granted it. It didn't stop the track's creator trying to choose it for a Grammy award. And photorum.eclat-mauve.fr despite the fact that the artists were fake, it was still wildly popular.

"I do not think the usage of generative AI for creative functions should be banned, but I do believe that generative AI for these purposes that is trained on people's work without consent should be banned," Mr Newton Rex includes. "AI can be extremely powerful but let's develop it ethically and relatively."

OpenAI says Chinese rivals using its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes market and dents America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - consisting of the BBC - have actually picked to block AI developers from trawling their online material for training purposes. Others have decided to collaborate - the Financial Times has partnered with ChatGPT creator OpenAI for instance.

The UK government is thinking about an overhaul of the law that would allow AI developers to utilize developers' material on the web to help establish their models, unless the rights holders pull out.

Ed Newton Rex explains this as "insanity".

He mentions that AI can make advances in areas like defence, healthcare and logistics without trawling the work of authors, journalists and artists.

"All of these things work without going and altering copyright law and ruining the incomes of the nation's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in the House of Lords, is likewise highly versus getting rid of copyright law for AI.

"Creative markets are wealth developers, 2.4 million jobs and a great deal of delight," says the Baroness, who is likewise a consultant to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The federal government is weakening among its finest carrying out industries on the unclear guarantee of growth."

A federal government spokesperson said: "No move will be made up until we are definitely positive we have a useful plan that delivers each of our goals: increased control for best holders to assist them accredit their content, access to high-quality material to train leading AI designs in the UK, and more transparency for best holders from AI developers."

Under the UK government's new AI plan, a national data library including public information from a large range of sources will also be provided to AI researchers.

In the US the future of federal rules to manage AI is now up in the air following President Trump's go back to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that intended to improve the security of AI with, to name a few things, firms in the sector needed to share details of the operations of their systems with the US government before they are released.

But this has now been reversed by Trump. It remains to be seen what Trump will do instead, [forum.batman.gainedge.org](https://forum.batman.gainedge.org/index.php?action=profile