eu.org
Secure.gov websites utilize HTTPS A lock (Lock Locked padlock) or https:// suggests you have actually securely linked to the.gov website. Share sensitive information just on authorities, secure sites.
procurel.com
- About - The Attorney general of the United States

• Organizational Chart
• Budget & Performance
• History
• Privacy Program
  
  - Press Releases
• Speeches
• Videos
• Photo Galleries
• Blogs
• Podcasts
  
  - Guidance Documents
• Forms
• Publications
• Information for Victims in Large Cases
• Justice Manual
• Business and Contracts
  
  - Why Justice?
• Benefits
• DOJ Vacancies
• Legal Careers at DOJ
  
  Utilities
  
  - About About
  
  Our Work
  
  - Contact the Division Contact the Division
  
  Report a Violation
  
  - Cases and Matters
• Press Room Press Room
  
  Videos
  
  Publications
  
  - Employment Opportunities Employment Opportunities
  
  Experienced Professionals
  
  Attorney general of the United States ´ s Honors Program
  
  Volunteer and Paid Student Internship Programs
  
  - Civil Liberty FOIA Civil Liberty FOIA
  
  Emmett Till Act/Cold Case Memoranda
  
  - En español
  
  - About - title=" About" About
• The Attorney General
• Organizational Chart
• Budget & Performance
• History
• Privacy Program
  
  - title=" News" News
• Press Releases
• Speeches
• Videos
• Photo Galleries
• Blogs
• Podcasts
  
  - title=" Guidance & Resources" Resources
• Guidance Documents
• Forms
• Publications
• Information for Victims in Large Cases - Justice Manual
• Business and Contracts
  
  - Employment
• Why Justice?
• Benefits
• DOJ Vacancies
• Legal Careers at DOJ
  
  - Our Offices
• Find Help
• Contact Us
  
  Breadcrumb
  
  1. Justice.gov
• Civil Liberty Division
• The Fair Housing Act
  
  The Fair Housing Act
  
  - Facebook
• X.
• LinkedIn.
• Email
  
  The Fair Housing Act, 42 U.S.C. 3601 et seq., forbids discrimination by direct providers of housing, such as proprietors and property companies in addition to other entities, such as municipalities, banks or other loan provider and property owners insurance provider whose discriminatory practices make housing unavailable to persons due to the fact that of:
  
  race or color. religious beliefs. sex. national origin. familial status, or. impairment.
  
  In cases including discrimination in mortgage loans or home enhancement loans, the Department might submit fit under both the Fair Housing Act and the Equal Credit Opportunity Act. The Department brings cases where there is proof of a pattern or practice of discrimination or where a rejection of rights to a group of persons raises an issue of public significance. Where force or hazard of force is utilized to reject or hinder fair housing rights, the Department of Justice may institute criminal procedures. The Fair Housing Act also provides treatments for managing individual complaints of discrimination. Individuals who think that they have actually been victims of a prohibited housing practice, may submit a complaint with the Department of Housing and Urban Development [HUD] or file their own claim in federal or state court. The Department of Justice brings suits on behalf of individuals based on referrals from HUD.
  
  Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Race or Color
  
  One of the central goals of the Fair Housing Act, when Congress enacted it in 1968, was to prohibit race discrimination in sales and leasings of housing. Nevertheless, more than 30 years later on, race discrimination in housing continues to be a problem. The bulk of the Justice Department's pattern or practice cases involve claims of race discrimination. Sometimes, housing service providers try to camouflage their discrimination by giving incorrect info about schedule of housing, either saying that absolutely nothing was available or guiding homeseekers to specific areas based upon race. Individuals who receive such false information or misdirection might have no knowledge that they have been victims of discrimination. The Department of Justice has brought numerous cases alleging this sort of discrimination based on race or color. In addition, the Department's Fair Housing Testing Program seeks to discover this kind of covert discrimination and hold those responsible accountable. Most of the mortgage lending cases brought by the Department under the Fair Housing Act and Equal Credit Opportunity Act have actually declared discrimination based upon race or color. Some of the Department's cases have actually likewise declared that towns and other city government entities violated the Fair Housing Act when they denied authorizations or zoning modifications for housing advancements, or relegated them to predominantly minority areas, due to the fact that the potential locals were anticipated to be mainly African-Americans.
  
  Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Religion
  
  The Fair Housing Act restricts discrimination in housing based upon faith. This prohibition covers instances of obvious discrimination against members of a particular faith also less direct actions, such as zoning ordinances developed to restrict the usage of private homes as a places of worship. The variety of cases submitted given that 1968 declaring religious discrimination is little in comparison to a few of the other forbidden bases, such as race or national origin. The Act does include a limited exception that enables non-commercial housing run by a spiritual organization to reserve such housing to individuals of the very same faith.
  
  Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Sex, Including Sexual Harassment
  
  The Fair Housing Act makes it illegal to discriminate in housing on the basis of sex. Over the last few years, the Department's focus in this location has been to challenge sexual harassment in housing. Women, particularly those who are poor, and with limited housing choices, typically have little option but to endure the humiliation and destruction of unwanted sexual advances or danger having their households and themselves removed from their homes. The Department's enforcement program is targeted at landlords who produce an untenable living environment by demanding sexual favors from renters or by developing a sexually hostile environment for them. In this way we look for both to acquire relief for tenants who have actually been treated unfairly by a property manager since of sex and likewise hinder other prospective abusers by making it clear that they can not continue their conduct without facing repercussions. In addition, rates discrimination in mortgage lending may likewise negatively impact ladies, especially minority ladies. This type of discrimination is unlawful under both the Fair Housing Act and Equal Credit Opportunity Act.
  
  Discrimination in Housing Based Upon National Origin
  
  The Fair Housing Act restricts discrimination based upon national origin. Such discrimination can be based either upon the country of an individual's birth or where his/her forefathers come from. Census data suggest that the Hispanic population is the fastest growing segment of our country's population. The Justice Department has taken enforcement action against municipal federal governments that have actually tried to minimize or limit the number of Hispanic households that might live in their communities. We have sued loan providers under both the Fair Housing Act and the Equal Credit Opportunity Act when they have actually imposed more rigid underwriting standards on mortgage or made loans on less beneficial terms for Hispanic customers. The Department has also sued loan providers for discrimination versus Native Americans. Other locations of the nation have experienced an increasing variety of nationwide origin groups within their populations. This consists of new immigrants from Southeastern Asia, such as the Hmong, the former Soviet Union, and other portions of Eastern Europe. We have acted versus personal landlords who have victimized such individuals.
  
  Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Familial Status
  
  The Fair Housing Act, with some exceptions, prohibits discrimination in housing versus households with kids under 18. In addition to restricting a straight-out rejection of housing to families with children, the Act also avoids housing suppliers from imposing any unique requirements or conditions on renters with custody of children. For instance, proprietors might not locate families with children in any single portion of a complex, put an unreasonable limitation on the overall variety of persons who may reside in a dwelling, or limit their access to recreational services provided to other occupants. In the majority of instances, the amended Fair Housing Act restricts a housing provider from declining to lease or sell to families with children. However, some centers might be designated as Housing for Older Persons (55 years of age). This kind of housing, which meets the requirements stated in the Housing for Older Persons Act of 1995, may run as "senior" housing. The Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) has published guidelines and additional assistance detailing these statutory requirements.
  
  Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Disability
  
  The Fair Housing Act prohibits discrimination on the basis of special needs in all types of housing transactions. The Act specifies persons with an impairment to mean those people with mental or physical impairments that substantially restrict several significant life activities. The term mental or physical disability might include conditions such as loss of sight, hearing impairment, mobility problems, HIV infection, psychological retardation, alcoholism, drug addiction, chronic fatigue, finding out special needs, head injury, and mental disorder. The term significant life activity may include seeing, hearing, strolling, breathing, carrying out manual jobs, taking care of one's self, discovering, speaking, or working. The Fair Housing Act likewise protects individuals who have a record of such a disability, or are considered having such an impairment. Current users of prohibited illegal drugs, individuals founded guilty for prohibited manufacture or distribution of a regulated compound, sex offenders, and juvenile offenders are not thought about disabled under the Fair Housing Act, by virtue of that status. The Fair Housing Act pays for no securities to individuals with or without impairments who provide a direct hazard to the individuals or residential or commercial property of others. Determining whether somebody presents such a direct risk must be made on a customized basis, nevertheless, and can not be based on general assumptions or speculation about the nature of an impairment. The Division's enforcement of the Fair Housing Act's securities for persons with impairments has focused on two significant areas. One is guaranteeing that zoning and other guidelines worrying land use are not used to impede the domestic choices of these individuals, consisting of unnecessarily restricting communal, or gather, domestic plans, such as group homes. The second location is insuring that newly built multifamily housing is integrated in accordance with the Fair Housing Act's availability requirements so that it is available to and functional by individuals with impairments, and, in particular, those who use wheelchairs. There are other federal statutes that forbid discrimination versus people with specials needs, including the Americans with Disabilities Act, which is imposed by the Disability Rights Section of the Civil Liberty Division.
  
  Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Disability Group Homes
  
  Some individuals with impairments may cohabit in congregate living arrangements, typically referred to as "group homes." The Fair Housing Act forbids municipalities and other regional federal government entities from making zoning or land use decisions or executing land usage policies that exclude or otherwise discriminate against people with disabilities. The Fair Housing Act makes it unlawful--
  
  - To utilize land usage policies or actions that deal with groups of persons with disabilities less favorably than groups of non-disabled persons. An example would be a regulation forbiding housing for individuals with impairments or a specific kind of special needs, such as mental illness, from locating in a specific location, while permitting other groups of unrelated people to cohabit in that location.
• To act versus, or reject an authorization, for a home due to the fact that of the disability of people who live or would live there. An example would be denying a structure permit for a home since it was meant to provide housing for individuals with psychological retardation.
• To refuse to make reasonable accommodations in land usage and zoning policies and procedures where such lodgings may be essential to afford individuals or groups of persons with disabilities a level playing field to use and delight in housing. What constitutes a reasonable lodging is a case-by-case decision. Not all asked for modifications of rules or policies are affordable. If an asked for adjustment imposes an undue monetary or administrative problem on a city government, or if a modification produces a fundamental alteration in a regional federal government's land use and zoning scheme, it is not a "sensible" lodging.
  
  Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Disability-- Accessibility Features for New Construction
  
  The Fair Housing Act specifies discrimination in housing versus individuals with disabilities to consist of a failure "to develop and construct" specific new multi-family dwellings so that they are accessible to and functional by persons with disabilities, and particularly individuals who utilize wheelchairs. The Act requires all multi-family residences of 4 or more systems planned for first tenancy after March 13, 1991, to have certain functions: an accessible entryway on an accessible route, accessible typical and public usage areas, doors adequately broad to accommodate wheelchairs, accessible routes into and through each home, light switches, electrical outlets, and thermostats in available location, supports in restroom walls to accommodate grab bar installations, and usable bathroom and kitchens configured so that a wheelchair can maneuver about the space.
  
  Developers, home builders, owners, and architects accountable for the design or building of brand-new multi-family housing may be held liable under the Fair Housing Act if their structures fail to satisfy these design requirements. The Department of Justice has brought many enforcement actions against those who stopped working to do so. The majority of the cases have been dealt with by approval decrees providing a variety of kinds of relief, consisting of: retrofitting to bring unattainable functions into compliance where practical and where it is not-- options (monetary funds or other building and construction requirements) that will attend to making other housing systems available